Posts Tagged ‘study groups’

Canadian Content

Monday, July 5th, 2010

0176103627

Canadian Content (6th Edition), by Sarah Norton and Nell Waldman

I know, I know, not all of you are Canadian.  That’s alright; this isn’t a book about grammar rules, so you won’t get confused.

I’ve had this book for many years (I have the 4th edition, actually), and use it several times per week.  It’s a book full of examples of essays, e.g. persuasive essays, comparison essays, cause-and-effect essays.  Each chapter begins with an explanation of the type of essay, goes on to an annotated essay (”here’s the introduction”, “here’s the thesis”, “here’s the first supporting point”, “here are some good transition words”, etc), and ends with several really good sample essays of that particular genre.  Each of the sample essays comes with a glossary, some reading questions (structure and strategy, and content and purpose), and some suggestions for writing.

This would, obviously, be a good book to have hanging around a writing or tutoring centre, but my students also find it useful to read when they need an example.   What does the professor mean when he requests a Classification and Division essay?  Have a look at the book and you’ll get some ideas.

Now, those of you who live in warmer climes may not get much out of Paul Quarrington’s essay Home Ice - which can be found in the Process Analysis: Explaining “How” section - if you don’t have a lot of experience with backyard skating rinks; however, essays like George Carlin’s Baseball and Football (Comparison and Contrast: Explaining Similarities and Differences) and Stephen King’s Why We Crave Horror Movies (Cause and Effect: Explaining “Why”) will have general appeal.  Neil Bissoondath’s I’m Not Racist But… (Definition: Explaining “What”) will be - regretfully - relevant to everyone.

You should be able to find a copy in your library; if not, I easily found cheap second-hand copies online.

Humans or Machines?

Monday, January 18th, 2010

Where I live, it’s the end of the semester; post-secondary schools have just finished and the high-schools are just beginning final exams.  Students are wired on caffeine, and going on little-to-no sleep.  Those in their last year of a programme are moved to livid tears by the thought of not getting at least 95%.

I get phone calls and e-mails: “Miss, I think I need you.”  Sometimes, my required response is obvious; this person cannot write a reasonable paper without supervision so, yes, they need me.  Sometimes, it’s a matter of just talking them over a rough spot.  A student may write a perfectly good paper but just needs to be reminded to check their verb tense or to remove contractions.  Many of my students are of this ilk.  All they need to do is run the paper through a grammar- or spell-checker, then go do something else for an hour so they can proofread the paper with fresh eyes.

The students who just have one or two problems - usually the same problem with each paper they write - are the ones who don’t really need me.  They can do with computer support or, perhaps, a study partner to proofread for them.

The other students… they need a tutor.  A computer programme may be able to help them with the punctuation or spelling, but it cannot help them with the actual writing.  There are problems with unsupported theses, repetition, disorganisation, rambling and irrelevant material; the list can go on and on.

Look at your own writing and decide what you need.  Have teachers and professors been scrawling “PLEASE SEE ME” on your papers all year?  In that case, you need a human tutor who can guide you through the writing process.  If your papers are returned looking very festive with all the red circles around the commas, you could run your paper through a computer programme (I, of course, recommend SentenceWorks) and see if you think that helps you fix the problems.

Your school will have some sort of tutoring or writing centre.  It may just be a couple of volunteers who hang around an office for a couple of hours each week, or perhaps it’s an on-line chat, or it may be a full-time tutoring centre.  Whatever it may be, if you feel you haven’t fulfilled the requirements of your assignment, please find a real, living-and-breathing person to help you do so.  Save the computer for the celebratory post-exam gaming sessions. :)

Study Groups

Monday, September 14th, 2009

This one is for the tutors.

Only 24 hours in the day and only 7 days in the week, and you’re expected to tutor how many people?! One purpose of this blog is to show Writing Centre personnel how to “do more with less”. The short answer: let them teach themselves (a.k.a. “study groups”).

For half of the working day, I’m a writer. I spend a lot of time with people who voluntarily eat, sleep and breathe the English language. These people are not learning how to write but they are constantly improving the process of writing. Writers pounce on each other, asking “Why?” Why use that word instead of this word? Why use a semi-colon instead of a period? Why put this paragraph before that paragraph? We stand in awe at a brilliant combination of words and then try to work the same magic with our own words. Reading each other’s work and asking questions is how we improve our own writing. These gatherings of writers are nothing more than… study groups.

For the other half of the working day, I’m an English tutor; it goes without saying that I rarely meet a student who enjoys English. Most of my students, like yours, are inclined to math or science or business, and about half of those utterly despise the process of writing.

My students do learn from me (they must, or I wouldn’t have been a tutor for so long) but I find they also learn very well from each other. I once had three engineering students who were all taking the same required English literature class. While all three were exceptional at maths and sciences, they were mediocre when it came to analysing literature and communicating their thoughts. Working with me on an individual basis, they each raised their marks by 5 or 10 marks but I wasn’t happy with this.

I brought the three of them together and just let them do their stuff. When Student A had a question, I let Student B and Student C try to answer it; one of them would usually have a response. Each student had a particular strength and was able to use that strength to help the other two. For instance, Student A was naturally good at seeing where there was likely to be a basis for classical allusions (although he didn’t have the background, so I would be the one to make reading suggestions), Student B found punctuation and sentence structure to be entirely rational, and Student C had an outstanding memory and could recall tidbits their teacher had given them. Eventually, the three of them were learning from each other, and I was left to step in only when they got completely stuck or to have a final look at something.

Classes have just started; this is the best time to help your students find other people who think and learn the way they do. Suggest they get three or four people in each study group, and that they try to discover each other’s forte (if you already know these students you can arrange the groups accordingly). If things work out, you can have a couple of groups working at once, while you go back and forth between them. While it doesn’t add any more hours to the day, it will make the mere 24 a little easier.

Sentenceworks Blog is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).