Posts Tagged ‘OWL at Purdue’

Abbreviations and Acronyms

Tuesday, June 29th, 2010

I assume you understand, by now, that the use of contractions in formal writing is frowned upon. There’s no particular reason for this other than contractions are a sign of laziness.

Abbreviations should also be avoided specifically for this reason. Is it really so difficult to write “Professor” rather than “Prof.”? When writing was a matter of cutting your own quills and stirring up the ink, or of saving inordinately expensive paper, there may have been an argument in favour of abbreviations; now, with computers and cheap recycled paper, I don’t think the argument would hold any water.

That said, there are a few situations where you’re allowed to be lazy:

* Credentials after names (e.g. M.D., B.A.), because they’re often short forms of Latin words which might take you several sentences to complete
* For the same reason, common abbreviations or acronyms which have been written out in full the first time they’re used in the paper (could you imagine writing deoxyribonucleic acid – DNA – a thousand times in a book?)
* Dates (e.g. 1066 A.D.)

If you are quoting something which uses abbreviations or acronyms, you must write it the way the original author wrote it; if the reference is vague, you might want to put in an editor’s note explaining the abbreviation in full.

Here are a couple of websites to get you thinking about such things:

Capital Community College

Monash University

If you’re following a particular format, they each have their own rules. Here are the OWL at Purdue’s pages for APA and MLA.

When in doubt, just write the words out in full; no one will criticise you for that.

Comma Enigma

Monday, June 21st, 2010

If you want to get some linguists all tied up in a knot, just say the word “comma”.  If you want a really big brouhaha, make sure half of those linguists are American and the other half British.

Good times all around.

Nadine Gordimer, a Nobel Prize-winning author, wrote this beautiful sentences in a short story called Loot (2003):

He has a lot of - things - some of which his eye falls upon often, so he must be fond of, some of which he doesn’t notice, deliberately, that he probably shouldn’t have acquired but cannot cast off, there’s an art nouveau lamp he reads by, and above his bed-head a Japanese print, a Hokusai, ‘The Great Wave’, he doesn’t really collect oriental stuff, although if it had been on the wall facing him it might have been more than part of the furnishings, it’s been out of sight behind his head for years.

Marvelous sentence.  Drives any writer to their knees in awe.  Drives the average linguist around the bend.

If you wrote such a sentence in a formal essay, you’d fail; creative writing demands the re-reading of sentences for pleasure, and formal writing demands clear, straight-forward communication.

Comma usage is - and probably always will be - up for debate.  The Americans have a fairly mathematical approach to commas (they’re notorious for serial commas and FANBOYS, and putting commas inside the quotes) while the British are more logical about it: commas go outside the quotes, and are used where necessary to make things easy for the reader.  Even within a particular English usage, people will argue whether or not a comma is appropriate.

The bottom line is, you’ll never find the “right” answer, just a handful of logical ones.  The OWL at Purdue has a really good PowerPoint slide on commas which you can download from here.  You can also look at their Comma Quick Rules page.

If you’re writing for a particular employer or professor, read some of their writing and see how they use commas (serial commas?  is “as” included in the list of FANBOYS?  do they like Nadine Gordimer’s writing?)  If you can’t get your hands on some of their writing, ask them specifically about their comma preferences; this way, you won’t fail.

Commas may drive you batty, but they’re also very interesting.  Here’s a lovely little video which covers the basics - with a smile!  There’s a website which gives a short history of punctuation, including commas.  For those of you who spend your summer on Facebook, there’s a page in favour of the Oxford comma.

Like the mud-puddles you examined as a child, commas are intriguing once you get knee-deep in them.

Parallel Structure

Monday, May 10th, 2010

Okay, I’m the first to admit that I’m not fond of following the rules; straight lines are for the birds.  However, when you have signed yourself up to follow the lines, it seems counterproductive to deliberately cross them.

Parallel structure is one of those things that is de rigueur in formal writing (though you’re welcome to toss it out the window when it comes to poetry and informal dialogue).  It’s difficult to explain in detail: do you understand what I mean when I say just make it all the same?  When you have several words, phrases or clauses strung together with commas and/or conjunctions, make sure all the verbs and all the articles follow the same pattern.

Here’s The OWL’s page on parallel structure, and another nifty little page from Bellevue College with some exercises on the bottom.

If you already have parallel structure under your belt, at least look at the Really Great Example they have on the Bellevue page: a mark, a yen, a buck or a pound.  Try saying that 10 times and see if it gets stuck in your head. :)

Sentenceworks Blog is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).