As an English tutor, I spend a great deal of time with people who don’t like English; the irony of this is not lost on me, so don’t worry about it. :) What I learn from my students is, mostly, perspective.
When you can’t get the right verb tense, that’s a major problem. When you can’t keep i-before-e-except-after-c-and-several-other-seemingly-random-circumstances straight, that’s a minor problem. When you use the passive voice, that’s not a problem.
They’re right. It’s a new-ish “rule” in the schools: using the passive voice in a formal essay will lose you marks.
For those of you who are furrowing your brows, the passive voice is where the subject of the sentence has something done to it, rather than doing something. For example:
- The cake was made by me. (passive)
- I made the cake. (active)
It seems simple, yes? The active voice would be used when someone feels strongly about something, when the speaker would be loud and excited. We tend to use the active voice for things like Teenagers break rules! or Penicillin saves lives! Now, people who are less-than-enthusiastic about teenagers or penicillin might say Rules are broken by teenagers, or Lives are saved by penicillin; neither voice will encourage nor discourage teenagers from breaking rules, or penicillin from saving lives. It’s just a matter of how the author feels about that subject.
Children learn to use the passive and active voices naturally. Listen to the next three-year-old that comes by, and you’ll hear an entirely active voice (”No, I don’t want that!”). Listen to a 6-year-old trying to blame something on her little brother, and you’ll hear a lot of the passive voice (”The window got broken. I think he was playing with a baseball.”)
You’ll find you naturally use the active and passive voices, too. If you’re really interested in your subject - passionate about it, even - you’ll write in the active voice. You’re determined to convince your reader to think the way you do, and so you slip into persuasive mode.
I think what the anti-passive rule is trying to do is to make the writer appear animated. They’re docking marks from people who aren’t thrilled about their subject. In this case, I can see their point.
What?
Yep. If you’re gonna do something, you should do it well. Admittedly, if you asked me to write about something scientific or mathematical, I’d have a hard time mustering the enthusiasm… but I’d try. I wouldn’t write a paper about a new medical technique that might, possibly, one day, save a life or two; I’d write about a new medical technique that would save a life. If you asked me to write a paper comparing Austen and the Bronte sisters, the Austen section would be written entirely in the passive voice, and the Brontes would be in the active (’cause the Brontes are awesome!)
So, no, passive voice isn’t bad. In fact, it’s great. When one is trying to explain something gently, softly, the passive voice is invaluable. The trick lies in knowing when your reader needs to be lulled, and when the active voice needs to whack them into action.